Ehrman vs McGrew - Round 2 – Do undesigned coincidences confirm the Gospels?
Playback speed
Bart D Ehrman and Tim J McGrew return to debate research by McGrew on the so-called ‘un-designed coincidences’ between different Gospel accounts that give them the ring of truth.
They also debate whether historical research can ever validate miraculous conclusions as they differ over accounts in the book of Acts.
For Bart Ehrman: http://wmich.edu/philosophy/directory/mcgrew
Read Tim McGrew on Un-designed Coincidences http://www.christianapologeticsalliance.com/2013/09/01/undesigned-coincidences/
For more faith debates visit http://www.premierchristianradio.com/Shows/Saturday/Unbelievable
Join the conversation: Facebook and Twitter
Get the MP3 podcast of Unbelievable? Via RSS or Via Itunes
Released on 24 Jul 2015
Coming up next
Do the minimal facts support the resurrection? Gary Habermas & James Crossley
Christian philosopher and historian Gary Habermas has been at the forefront of the ‘minimal facts’ approach as evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. He debates the commonly agreed facts with agnostic New Testament scholar James Crossley and they d....
New Testament listener Q&A - Gary Habermas & James Crossley
Christian Bible scholar Gary Habermas and agnostic New Testament scholar James Crossley return to answer questions sent in by Unbelievable? listeners. They answer your questions on the Jewishness of Jesus, the dating of the New Testament documents a....
The case from science for & against God – Peter Atkins vs Zachary Ardern
Young Christian biologist Zahary Ardern goes up against longstanding atheist scientist Peter Atkins as each present their case for and against God. Does science reveal a universe best explained as the product of a creative, intelligent, mind or a un....
